PENGARUH KUALITAS AUDIT, KONDISI KEUANGAN PERUSAHAAN, PERTUMBUHAN PERUSAHAANTERHADAP OPINI AUDIT GOING CONCERN
Abstract
Abstract
The effect of quality audit, financial condition and corporate growth against audit opinion going concern in manufacturing industry of textile and garment sector listed in Indonesia stock exchange period 2012-2016. The purpose of this research is to analyze the effect of quality audit, financial condition and corporate growth partially and simultaneously towards acceptance of going concern audit opinion on textile and garment manufacturing industry which listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange for 2012-2016 period. Going concern audit opinion is said to be a marker for companies that get auditor's assessment of its business continuity. In a sense the company has a risk in continuing the business. The metedology in this study using causality and a total population of 89 companies, sampling in this study using purposive sampling method and the data used comes from secondary data in the form of annual financial statements data and annual audit report data of textile and garment manufacturing company that listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during 5 years, ie 2012-2016 and the sample used is 75 companies. Data analysis techniques in this study using binary logistic regression analysis, descriptive statistical test, omnibus test, wald test, and the coefficient of determination nagelkerke. The results of this study are quality audit, financial condition and corporate growthsimultaneously affect the trend of acceptance of going concern audit opinion. Partially, the quality audit and financial condition of the company have a significant negative effect on the tendency of acceptance of going concern audit opinion and the variable of the company's growth does not affect the tendency of acceptance of going concern audit opinion. This shows that audit quality and financial condition of the company is a variable that can be considered for giving auditors going ongoing opinion by the auditor. The research findings indicate a high sales possibility that the company will not get a going concern audit opinion because in high sales it does not have the meaning of not having efficient. The unique thing in this study is the corporate growth is not being with going concern audit opinion, which should be the corporate growth with going concern audit opinion.
Keywords : quality audit, financial condition, corporate growth, going concern audit opinion
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alvin. A. Arens, Randal J. Elder, Mark S. Beasley, Amir Abadi Jusuf. (2012). Audit dan Jasa Assurance:Pendekatan Terpadu (Adaptasi Indonesia), Jakarta : Penerbit Salemba Empat.
Ardiani, N. Emrinaldi Nur DP. dan Nur A. (2012). Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Disclosure, Ukuran KAP, Debt Default, Opinion Shopping, dan Kondisi Keuangan Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi. Vol 20, No. 4 Desember 2012.
Belkaoui, Ahmed R. (2006). Teori Akuntansi. Edisi Terjemahan. Jilid 1 Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Fanny, Margaretta dan Saputra, S. (2005). Opini Audit Going Concern: Kajian Berdasarkan Model Prediksi Kebangkrutan, Pertum-buhan Perusahaan, Dan Reputasi Kantor Akuntan Publik (Studi Pada Emiten Bursa Efek Jakarta). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VIII. 966-978. Denpasar Bali.
Hangoluang, Brilliant. (2014). Pengaruh Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan, Ukuran perusahaan, Opinion Shopping dan Audit Client Tenure terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Listing di BEI tahun 2005-2010). Skripsi Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Januarti, Indira. (2008). Analisis Pengaruh faktor Perusahaan, Kualitas Auditor, Kepemilikan Perusahaan Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Simposium Nasinal Akuntansi XII.
Kristiana, Ira. (2003). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Vol. 1 No.1,Januari.
Kristiana, Ira. (2012). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Pertumbuhan Perusahan, Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern Pada Perusahan Munufaktur yang Terdaftar di bursa efek Indonesia. Berkala ilmiah mahasiswa akuntansi – vol 1, no. 1, Januari 2012.
Marisi P. Purba. (2006). Company Going Concern. Diakses April, 16, 2011 dari (http://www.google.com).
Mulyadi. (2002). Auditing. Buku 2. Yogyakarta: Salemba Empat.
Praptitorini, Mirna Dyah dan Indira Januarti. (2007). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Dept Default, dan Opinion Shopping terhadap Penerimaan Opini Going Concern. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X. Juli 2007. Makasar.
Ramadhany, Alexander. (2004). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penerimaan Opini Going Concern Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Mengalami Financial Distress di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Jurnal Maksi Volume 4.
Ready Hartas, Haris M. (2011). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Kondisi Keuanga, Manajemen Laba, dan Mekanisme Corporate Governance terhadap Opini audit going Concern, hal 1
Rudyawan dan Badera. (2009). (dalam Ira, Kristiana,2012). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern, volume 1, (Januari 2003), hlm.49.
Ruiz , Barbadillo Emiliano, Nivez Gomez-Aguilar, Christina De Fuentes-Barbera dan MariaAntonia Garcia-Benau. (2004). Audit Quality and The Going Concern Decision MakingProcess. European Accounting Review, Vol 13 No 4. pp 597-620.
Santoso, Arga. F dan Linda K. Wedari. (2007). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. JAAI. Vl 11 No: 3. Pp 141- 158.
Setyarno, Eko Budi, Indira Januarti dan Faisal (2006). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan, Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi IX Padang. 1- 25.
Soewiyanto, Maria Anjelina. (2012). Aspek-Aspek Dalam Pemberian Opini Going Concern. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahsiswa Akuntansi, Vol, 1, No. 2, Maret 2012.
Susiana dan Arleen Herawaty. (2007). Analisis Pengaruh Independensi, Mekanisme Corporate Governance, dan Kualitas Audit terhadap Integritas Laporan Keuangan. Disampaikan pada Simposium Nasional Akuntansi (SNA) X Makassar.
Watkins, A.L. W. Hillison, dan S.E. Morecroft. (2004). Audit Quality: A Synthesis of Theory and Empirical Evidence.Journal of AccountingLiterature. 23. pp. 153—193.
Adhikara MFA. (2008). “Mental Accounting investor (Studi Eksplorasi Perilaku Preferensi Investor di Bursa Efek Indonesia)”. Jurnal Indonusa 13 (12), 251-261
Adhikara MFA. (2006). Manfaat Informasi Keuangan Dalam Memprediksi Return Saham. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Teropong 1 (no 2).
Jumono, S., Fachruddin AA, M., Matari FM, C. (2017). Profit Structure of Indonesian Banking Industry (An Empirical Study Based on Du Pont Model), Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics, Finance, and Banking 5 (2), 1947-1968
S Handayani. (2014). Kualitas Pengungkapan dan Manajemen Laba dalam Kaitannya dengan Karakteristik Perusahaan. Jurnal Ekonomi 5 (FEB Universitas Esa Unggul), 99.
SH Adrie Putra. (2013). Self Control Behavior On The Personel Financial Management Behavior Based On The Theory Planned Behavior Using Partial Least Square Approached Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI)Call For Papers “Sustainable Competitive Advantage-3” FE Universitas.
A Putra, MFA Arrozi. (2013). Dead Bank Walking Evidence from Banking Sector in Indonesia- International Proceedings of Economics …, - IACSIT Press.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Esa Unggul
Jalan Arjuna Utara No 9 Kebon Jeruk Jakarta 11510
Telp : 021 5674223 ext 266
email : [email protected]